Jump to content

Question on the Moriarty's snipers...


lawrebea000

Recommended Posts

If Holmes was honest in the note he left at the Falls, and he had tied up all the lose ends and put all his worldly ducks in a row, then yeah....it seems like he was prepared to not return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And don't that show just how well Gatiss and Moffat know their Sherlock Holmes?  A hundred year old mystery right before our eyes. So, in "The Final Problem" the answer is just as convoluted as we get in Sherlock if we even get the right answer in Holmes' explanation to Watson in "Adventure of the Empty House". So, maybe what we see in "The Empty Hearse" isn't as choppy as much as a pointing out that really.....even in Canon....we don't know what really did happen because Sherlock Holmes never did tell us.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be at all surprised if this is one of the questions that's been batted around in Holmes fan circles for the past century -- so of course Moftiss would have picked up on it.  The Holmes brothers certainly could have orchestrated the whole original thing, just as they did in Sherlock.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes, put two genius heads together and you get down right scary stuff. But it makes "The Empty Hearse" a whole lot clearer.....well...as clear as we can get...which can still be pretty muddy with this lot. But a whole lot more fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, you've heard it from the man himself now :).

 

Seriously, I don't think we're ever going to get a definite answer to this from Moftiss, sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's because even in canon there isn't one. Doyle's solution in "The Final Problem" is problematic in its self because in reading the ending carefully, Doyle left Sherlock Holmes an out and it indicates that something significant happened before Holmes wrote his supposedly last letter to Watson and I think Mofftiss hit on it and used it in "The Reichenbach Fall". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I'm so happy to have found this discussion. That was the one thing about season 3 that really bothered me ... we never got an answer as to "why" John was kept in the dark for two long years. It still seems unneccesarily cruel to me, but I finally have an explanation I can accept. I still wish something like this had been somewhere in the scripts, but hey. Thanks James, live long and prosper! :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of UseWe have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.Privacy PolicyGuidelines.