Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'copyright'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Afghanistan or Iraq?
    • Help & Assistance.
    • Suggestions & Requests
    • Bugs & Problems
    • Forum News and Updates.
  • Greater London
    • General Musings
    • Introduce yourself here.
  • 221B Baker Street
    • BBC Sherlock
    • The Mind Palace
    • The Casebooks.
    • Other Versions
    • General Sherlock Holmes Discussion
    • The Great Games (RPG Area)
    • Sherlock Holmes Related Events
    • True Crime Discussion (Pre 1930)


There are no results to display.

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start










Website URL




Custom Rank:

Found 1 result

  1. It's been asserted several times on this forum that all of Conan Doyle's Holmes stories are now in the public domain (i.e., no longer protected by copyright). As I understand it, this is true in the UK (and presumably in certain other countries as well). But it's not quite true in the US, where (as I understand it) copyrights last 90 years, so Conan Doyle's last few Holmes stories are still under copyright here, and the last copyright won't expire till 2017. However, the Conan Doyle estate has been using this fact to claim that they still own a US copyright on the original characters, not just on those last few stories. As you might expect, this claim has been challenged in court, and a US district court judge has just ruled that the estate is wrong. Here's an excerpt from the NY Times article: Chief Judge Rubén Castillo of the United States District Court of the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, stated that elements introduced in Holmes stories published after 1923 — such as the fact that Watson played rugby for Blackheath, or had a second wife — remain under copyright in the United States. (All of the Holmes stories are already in the public domain in Britain.) But the judge rejected what he called the estate’s “novel legal argument” that the characters remain under copyright because, it claimed, they were not truly completed until Conan Doyle published his last Holmes story in 1927. “Klinger and the public may use the pre-1923 story elements without seeking a license,” the judge wrote. .
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of UseWe have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.Privacy PolicyGuidelines.